Our Sponsors
Jabong | Flipkart | Amazon | Myntra | Aircel | MakemyTrip | PayTM | RedBus | YepMe | Blue Stone | FreeCharge | SnapDeal
As we all know about the hit and run case of Salman lodged in 2002 and was going for final arguments. Salman’s lawyer Shrikant Shivade says that Salman was not drunk and alleged on police for tampered with the actor’s blood sample.
Shrikant says, "No drunken driving case made out against Salman earlier. When the FIR was registered, no reference, whatsoever, was made to that of drunken driving. This entire story of drunken driving was created only on 1 October, 2002".
Shrikant further claims, "The bar manager can interpret the body language of a person who has consumed liquor. He said that Salman was walking normally and there was no smell of liquor. So, the doctor’s evidence on liquor was totally fabricated".
Shivade said, "The entire statement of this witness is unbelievable due to various reasons. The position in which he was, it was impossible to see anything. The statement is a figment of imagination".
Salman’s lawyer added, "Bombay Prohibition Rules prescribe that a doctor has to decide whether to draw a blood sample from a person, and not the police. A doctor from JJ hospital has deposed that police asked him to test the sample”.
He continued, "The extraction and transfer of blood was in violation of law. The sealing of bottles too was done in violation of law. The doctor said the medical examination was over in five minutes. How can a string of tests be conducted in five minutes? Why was blood extracted twice? Samples were changed by police during investigation".
Stick to the tab for more news.
(200 symbols max)
(256 symbols max)
Comments